🔗 Share this article

This decision from the DNC to suppress the publication of its internal post-election analysis on the last presidential race is remarkable however to be expected. Resistant to unpleasant candor, the party's leadership apparatus operates more like a publicity machine than an electoral entity devoted to building local power for winning elections.

A Culture Resistant to Internal Critique

Unwilling to break with the party establishment's culture demanding unity, the committee has remained under that legacy throughout this past year. Releasing such a report could have demonstrated whether the leadership are interested to promote open debate regarding the missteps that enabled the former president to win re-election. However, the DNC is proceeding as if there are no lessons to glean from the electoral catastrophe from the last cycle.

The top priority: does this help us win? Should the answer be negative, it’s a distraction from our fundamental goal," a rationale that has been offered for withholding the report.

Major Failures an Analysis Would Have Examined

An autopsy report of substance would tackle head-on certain uncomfortable matters. This encompasses:

• Voter Disenchantment: Failing to retain among millions of voters who supported the Democratic ticket in 2020 was decisive during the tight recent race.
• A Insistence to Run: The unwavering decision of a party leader to seek re-election, coupled with a very late withdrawal, has been criticized as denying Democratic voters the chance for a genuine choice.
• Losing Touch With Core Democratic Voters: Amid inflation, the campaign allegedly ceding to elite contributors while failing to challenge the impact of big business.
• A Gaza Effect: An unwillingness to shift a policy position on a ongoing war is cited as alienating significant blocs, particularly among young people, Arab American communities, and Muslim Americans.
• Eroding Young Voter Allegiance: Polling data demonstrates a major drop-off in Democratic support from the youth electorate.

A Pattern of Evasion

Choosing secrecy fits a pattern of evading difficult realities. It recalls an episode where virtually every elected Democrat in Congress acquiesced to a sitting president's insistence on seeking another term right up until a disastrous public debate performance compelled a reversal.

Meanwhile, large majorities of the electorate were consistently telling researchers that they did not want that candidate to seek re-election.

Financial Issues

A thorough autopsy would also examine issues about where money went, such as what sums went to high-priced advisors as well as ad buyers during a campaign which expended a staggering sum over a few months.

The Larger Issue

Ultimately, the suppression regarding the analysis is symptomatic of an allegiance toward the established hierarchy responsible for an unsuccessful presidential campaign. The signal to ordinary supporters – which includes countless small donors – is that they do not be trusted to know what the insiders have learned from a report based on conversations with insiders.

A party incapable to honestly assess where it went wrong will struggle to escape the cycle that ended up being so advantageous to their opponents.